
Low-carb
diets get some vindication Two new studies show faster
weight loss over the short term
Obesity rates are rising, but science has barely weighed
in on the best way for people to shed fat. That state of
affairs is starting to change, and doctors are getting a
surprise or two.
Last month, the popular carb-slashing Atkins diet received
a dollop of endorsement from two studies after years of
being pooh-poohed by health specialists. The
studies, published in the journal Annals of Internal
Medicine, showed that the meat- and fat-rich regimen
caused faster weight loss in the short term than a conventional
low-fat diet.
More important - because many had feared that the diet,
even if slimming, might unfavorably affect cholesterol levels
and be bad for the heart - the low-carb
regimen also seemed to improve the dieters' blood fat profiles.
But Atkins, like every other diet, is no miraculous fat-melter.
The longer of the two studies suggested that a low-carb
regimen might be harder to maintain beyond six months compared
with a low-fat approach: By the end of the year, the low-fat
dieters had caught up and lost the same - very modest -
amount of heft.
In addition, even though on average people on low-carb diets
didn't experience rises in their so-called "bad"
(or LDL) cholesterol levels, about 30 percent of individuals
did.
Even with these caveats, "We can no longer dismiss
very-low-carbohydrate diets," said Dr. Walter Willett,
a nutritional epidemiologist at the Harvard School of Public
Health, in a written editorial accompanying the papers.
To maximize the diets' healthfulness, he added, people should
avoid going hog-wild on fatty bacon and red meat - opting
instead to eat healthy oils (monounsaturated and polyunsaturated
fats) and get protein from fish, beans,
nuts and chicken.
The weight-loss regimen popularized by the late Dr. Robert
Atkins - rich in meat, eggs and cheese but almost bereft
of grains, potatoes and fruit - is highly popular but had
not been tested in a scientifically rigorous way until last
year, when two studies reported that very obese and moderately
obese people lost more weight initially on the Atkins diet
than on a conventional diet.
The studies published last month bolster and extend these
findings.
Conducted at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
the first study enrolled 132 severely obese adults who had
an average weight of 288 pounds. Many of the patients in
the study had diabetes or other risk factors for coronary
artery disease.
Roughly half of them were instructed to pursue a low-fat
diet in which they were to eat 500 fewer calories a day.
The others followed a regimen in which they were to limit
their carbohydrate intake to less than 30 grams daily but
were not instructed to count calories or fat. Both groups
were counseled on the diets each week.
The scientists reported last year that at six months, the
low-carbohydrate group had lost an average of about 13 pounds,
compared with 4 pounds for the low-fat group.
Last month, the scientists reported that after one year,
individuals on the Atkins-style diet largely kept the weight
off but did not continue to lose more weight. The low-fat
group continued to lose weight slowly over the course of
the year.
Total weight loss for both groups over the year was slight:
an average of 11 to 19 pounds for the low-carb group and
seven to 19 pounds for the low-fat group.
In addition, the study found that diabetic patients improved
control over their blood sugar levels using the low-carb
approach.
The second investigation was funded by the Robert C. Atkins
Foundation, although the foundation did not take part in
the study or its analysis. Conducted at Duke University
Medical Center in Durham, N.C., it enrolled 120 moderately
obese adults who had high blood cholesterol levels.
At six months, participants who followed a low-carb approach
had lost an average of 26 pounds, compared with 14 pounds
for the low-fat group.
Weight loss wasn't the only effect of these diets. Both
studies found that levels of triglycerides - blood fats
that are risk factors for heart disease - fell further in
the low-carb group than in the low-fat group. Levels of
HDL, or "good" cholesterol, also appeared to improve
more in the low-carb group.
Still, experts said more studies were needed to ensure that
the HDL lipid change was favorable and that the higher amounts
of fat consumed on an Atkins-style diet would not increase
a dieter's risk for heart disease.
The American Heart Association issued a statement expressing
concern about the safety of the diet, given its richness
in saturated fats - and noting that at one year, in any
case, the results for the diets were a wash.
To be safe, people on an Atkins-style diet should have their
blood lipids monitored regularly in case their "bad"
cholesterol goes up, said Dr. William Yancy, assistant professor
of medicine at Duke and lead author of the study there.
If a low-carb diet sheds more fat in the short term - why
does it? Atkins always held that the secret of his diet
was ketosis, a body state in which fat would be burned more
efficiently. But the key may be rather less magical, said
Dr. Frederick Samaha, chief of cardiology at the Philadelphia
Veterans Affairs Medical Center and co-author of the Philadelphia
study.
Low-carbohydrate diets are richer in protein and fat, which
have the effect of making a person feel full more rapidly.
That means they'll eat fewer calories.
Not only that, but people following an Atkins-style diet
have many more food restrictions, which could also slash
the number of calories they consume.
These very restrictions could make it harder to stay with
the diet over the longer haul - and might easily be the
reason why patients on low-carb diets eventually stopped
losing weight, while low-fat dieters continued to lose,
Samaha said.
"I think it's partly the monotony - but also, the low-carb
diet really forces people to prepare their own foods - to
go out and buy fish and chicken and meat," he said.
"Whereas for low-fat diets there's a lot of really
good, readily available food to grab off the shelf."